🚚 at no charge SHIPPING on orders over $50 | ⭐ 4.6/5 from 200+ reviews
Vintageβœ“ In StockπŸ”₯ Bestseller

Hollister High Rise Vintage Stretch Shorts

β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…4.6 out of 5(200 reviews)
Special Offer Price
$20
$33.33
Sale
βœ“ gratis delivery on this item β€’ Limited time offer

size 1 or waist 25blue

πŸ”’
Secure Checkout
🚚
rapid dispatch
↩️
uncomplicated Returns

πŸ“‹ Product Description

Hollister High Rise Vintage Stretch Shorts

size 1 or waist 25
blue

This product is flawless for anyone looking for quality Vintage products.

πŸ“ Specifications

SKU: 342017

Category: Vintage > Clothing > Shorts

Original Price:$33.33 USD

Sale Price:$20 USD

Availability: In Stock

Condition: Brand recent

🚚 distribution & Returns

βœ“ complimentary fulfillment on orders over $50

Standard dispatch: 3-5 business days

Express dispatch: 1-2 business days (+$9.99)

30-Day Returns: Not satisfied? Return within 30 days for a full refund.

⭐ Recommended For You

4.6
β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…
Based on 5626 reviews
DC
Daniel Clark βœ“ Verified Purchase
2 months ago Β· Chicago, IL
β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜†
fancy love love!​
The Hollister High Rise Vintage Stretch Shorts looks fine in real life.
19 people found this helpful
RS
Rachel Scott βœ“ Verified Purchase
2 months ago Β· San Antonio, TX
β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…
incredibly happy
Personally, it fits my needs so no complaints.
2 people found this helpful
TM
Tyler Mitchell βœ“ Verified Purchase
1 month ago Β· Dallas, TX
β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…
Absolutely appreciate it
fulfillment took a bit longer, but the Hollister High Rise Vintage Stretch Shorts is okay.
5 people found this helpful
WG
William Garcia βœ“ Verified Purchase
6 months ago Β· Aurora, CO
β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…
supreme purchase ever
Honestly, the Hollister High Rise Vintage Stretch Shorts works as described so it’s acceptable. Packaging was elementary.
12 people found this helpful
CL
Christopher Lee βœ“ Verified Purchase
5 months ago Β· Atlanta, GA
β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…
So happy with this
I wouldn’t hesitate to grab the Hollister High Rise Vintage Stretch Shorts again.
11 people found this helpful