🚚 at no charge SHIPPING on orders over $50 | ⭐ 4.6/5 from 991+ reviews
Vintageβœ“ In StockπŸ”₯ Bestseller

Vintage Jade tea cup w strainer

β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…4.6 out of 5(991 reviews)
Special Offer Price
$6.5​
$10.83
Sale
βœ“ gratis delivery on this item β€’ Limited time offer

Japanese. It's hard to find. This has no chips or cracks. magnificent piece.

πŸ”’
Secure Checkout
🚚
rapid shipment
↩️
straightforward Returns

πŸ“‹ Product Description

Vintage Jade tea cup w strainer

Japanese. It's hard to find. This has no chips or cracks. splendid piece.

This product is ideal for anyone looking for quality Vintage products.

πŸ“ Specifications

SKU: 238540

Category: Vintage > Serving Pieces > Teacups

Original Price:$10.83 USD

Sale Price:$6.5 USD​

Availability: In Stock

Condition: Brand fresh

🚚 shipment & Returns

βœ“ on the house dispatch on orders over $50

Standard fulfillment: 3-5 business days

Express transport: 1-2 business days (+$9.99)

30-Day Returns: Not satisfied? Return within 30 days for a full refund.

⭐ Recommended For You

4.6
β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…
Based on 7585 reviews
JA
Joshua Allen
9 months ago Β· Las Vegas, NV
β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…
Worth every penny
I wouldn’t call it remarkable, but the Vintage Jade tea cup w strainer is solid.​
34 people found this helpful
SL
Stephanie Lewis βœ“ Verified Purchase
2 months ago Β· Portland, OR
β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…
Outstanding quality
From my experience, it feels okay so I’m okay with it.
1 people found this helpful
AW
Ashley White
2 weeks ago Β· San Francisco, CA
β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…
fancy love love!
From my experience, the Vintage Jade tea cup w strainer is practical so no complaints.
29 people found this helpful

CL
Christopher Lee βœ“ Verified Purchase
3 months ago Β· Tampa, FL
β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…
Exceptional quality
The Vintage Jade tea cup w strainer performs smoothly.
27 people found this helpful
CL
Christopher Lee βœ“ Verified Purchase
6 months ago Β· Minneapolis, MN

β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…
Fantastic product
At first, the Vintage Jade tea cup w strainer feels okay so it’s acceptable.
45 people found this helpful